[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?

Subject: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:00:47 +0900
In-reply-to: <B9EBD2474913AD4A995B8C7B8BEF8C0E159AE7A0B7@FHDP1LUMXC7V43.us.one.verizon.com>
References: <CAPKkNb7kYtxnNRescof-jiPReUi3N4X19WN1XSqBsbPZ0D0yag@mail.gmail.com> <B9EBD2474913AD4A995B8C7B8BEF8C0E159AE7A0B7@FHDP1LUMXC7V43.us.one.verizon.com>

> IPv4 /32 :: IPv6 /128

i.e. a single host or gkw behind a nat.  kinda what i get from comcast
and twt now.

> IPv4 /29 :: IPv6 /64

i.e. i get a lan segment.

makes sense

> The minimum assignment requiring a swip is also ensconced in RIR
> policy.

i am sure that, if you dig deeply enough, a recipe for chocolate chip
cookies is ensconced in RIR policy.  the bookkeepers drank koolaid and
think they have become regulators.

does samantha know her mom is a wannabe lawyer?  :)

randy

References:
- Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
  - From: mureninc at gmail.com (Constantine A. Murenin)
- Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
  - From: heather.schiller at verizon.com (Schiller, Heather A)

Prev by Date: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
Next by Date: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
Previous by thread: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
Next by thread: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread