[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IP Address Management IPAM software for small ISP
- Subject: IP Address Management IPAM software for small ISP
- From: elouie at yahoo.com (Eric A Louie)
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:48:43 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <CAK5YLgcXqdOUH6EzHWp=1bGFTedY=gpDaqTiADJ2xLOZy0DW8g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAK5YLgcXqdOUH6EzHWp=1bGFTedY=gpDaqTiADJ2xLOZy0DW8g@mail.gmail.com>
That is a superb suggestion, Aftab. I actually did a search through the
archives for "IPAM" and "IP address management" and the results were ...
unsatisfactory. Perhaps I used the wrong archive, and you direct me to an
alternate:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/ is the one I used.
I've looked at IPPLan but have not installed it yet. Does anyone with direct
experience with it care to share their view?
Much appreciated, Eric
________________________________
From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com>
To: Eric A Louie <elouie at yahoo.com>
Cc: NANOG Operators' Group <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Thu, December 13, 2012 2:10:24 AM
Subject: Re: IP Address Management IPAM software for small ISP
Kindly search the archives for many threads on the same subject, which should be
the normal practice.
nevertheless, IPPlan, PHPIP, PHPIPAM are good enough as per the need. The first
one I assume should serve your purpose for both v4 and v6.
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Eric A Louie <elouie at yahoo.com> wrote:
I'm looking for IPAM solutions for a small regional wireless ISP. There are 4
>Tier 2 personnel and 2 NOC technicians who would be using the tool, and a small
>staff of engineers.
>
>They have regionalized IP addresses so blocks are local, but there are subnets
>that are global.
>
>don't care if it's a linux or windows solution.
>
>Need to be able to migrate from FreeIPdb (yes, I know, it's a dinosaur)
>
>We're not dealing with a lot now, but the potential for growth is pretty high.
>
>What are you using and how is it working for you?
>
> Much appreciated, Eric
>