[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

btw, the itu imploded

Subject: btw, the itu imploded
From: dot at dotat.at (Tony Finch)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:17:23 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <m2r4msxvyb.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> On 19/12/2012 14:25, Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > Do you have any citations for that? I thought they had given up on trying
> > to interfere with Internet peering and settlement.
>
> http://www.itu.int/net/ITU-T/lists/questions.aspx?Group=03&Period=15

Looks vaguely ominous. Do they have a document which gives their
definition of "international telecommunications services" and "NGNs"?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first.
Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good,
occasionally poor at first.

Follow-Ups:
- btw, the itu imploded
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)

References:
- btw, the itu imploded
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- btw, the itu imploded
  - From: mikea at mikea.ath.cx (Mike A)
- btw, the itu imploded
  - From: woody at pch.net (Bill Woodcock)
- btw, the itu imploded
  - From: dot at dotat.at (Tony Finch)
- btw, the itu imploded
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)

Prev by Date: btw, the itu imploded
Next by Date: btw, the itu imploded
Previous by thread: btw, the itu imploded
Next by thread: btw, the itu imploded
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread