[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
why haven't ethernet connectors changed?
- Subject: why haven't ethernet connectors changed?
- From: EWieling at nyigc.com (Eric Wieling)
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:30:00 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=b4TzVWJ-VYasCeJXFDsEV5RFOmEAkAxTyK+CtpPPKaqA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
The only thing I would change about RJ-45 is a longer tab (but make it optional) for when you care more about ease of removal than cable tangles. Polycom phones are hell to try and unplug the RJ-45, for example.
-----Original Message-----
From: Naslund, Steve [mailto:SNaslund at medline.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:43 AM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: RE: why haven't ethernet connectors changed?
Please, no connectors that do not lock into place. Is plugging in the
RJ-45 that much of a task? Most portable devices are going wireless in any case so they are not an issue. The RJ-45 has worked OK for me. The AUI connectors have a special place in networking hell. What an incredibly horrible mechanical design they were? The flip side of the question is why you think the RJ-45 should change. You could argue that you don't usually need all eight wires but every time we tried that argument someone came up with a compelling reason to use more wires. I like that it is very standard. In the fiber world it is a continuous issue of hybrid patch cords dealing with ST,SC,LC and all the other variants out there. It would be a huge nightmare if the same thing happened with copper Ethernet.
I am also not a huge fan of the USB connector because I have seen a lot of those break and there is no positive retention. Magnetic is cute but has no place in a datacenter and even with desktops I can picture a lot of support calls because someone bumps a wire that knocks the mag connector out of place. I really hate dongles of all types but I guess you don't really have a choice with devices so physically thin that you can't get the jack in there.
I think I will keep the RJ for now.
Steven Naslund
-----Original Message-----
From: Aled Morris [mailto:aledm at qix.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:38 PM
To: Michael Thomas
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: why haven't ethernet connectors changed?
On 20 December 2012 18:20, Michael Thomas <mike at mtcc.com> wrote
> ethernet
> connectors haven't changed that I'm aware in pretty much 25 years.
15-pin D-type AUI connectors with slide latches?
BNC for thinwire?
I do agree though, something more like mini-USB would be more appropriate for home Ethernet use.
Aled