[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

questions regarding prefix hijacking

Subject: questions regarding prefix hijacking
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 15:58:26 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Aug 2013 03:07:04 -0700." <CANQy6FYykU2WUt8C6T18gXV5yT+J3Y43k=xAT5s6XeWfpSNJ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJx5YvFPgJwM_hSVdPhEAc3oOjyiNLGNCi=Zo=pX_WPB8UnwHA@mail.gmail.com> <CANQy6Fa8jGwF2LjuC47eBbndt0GemUm3z0iUrkQo6L7g1EOZMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJx5YvF0K_aM3Kb46RLWU3g9BKXgqCyrq_atG+WRkJLcKoshhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANQy6FYykU2WUt8C6T18gXV5yT+J3Y43k=xAT5s6XeWfpSNJ0Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 03:07:04 -0700, Paul Ferguson said:

> Having said that, there are quite a few documented cases of it being
> done intentionally, and for nefarious purposes.

Do I need ECC on my brain to stop the bitrot, or was there a kerfluffle a
long ways back when somebody announced 127/8, and a surprising number of
systems actually bit?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130807/a11b6e01/attachment.bin>

References:
- questions regarding prefix hijacking
  - From: m4rtntns at gmail.com (Martin T)
- questions regarding prefix hijacking
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
- questions regarding prefix hijacking
  - From: m4rtntns at gmail.com (Martin T)
- questions regarding prefix hijacking
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)

Prev by Date: IPAM
Next by Date: questions regarding prefix hijacking
Previous by thread: questions regarding prefix hijacking
Next by thread: questions regarding prefix hijacking
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread