[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers
- Subject: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers
- From: woody at pch.net (Bill Woodcock)
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:16:43 -0700
- In-reply-to: <017601cea358$00a86ad0$01f94070$@com>
- References: <017601cea358$00a86ad0$01f94070$@com>
On Aug 27, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eric Louie <elouie at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Based on various conversation threads on Nanog I've come up with a few
> criteria for evaluating Tier 1 providers.
It's easy. Tier 1 is yourself. Tier 2 is your customers and your competitors. Tier 3 is your customers' customers, your competitors' customers, and your customers' competitors.
But yes, I'm sure there are as many criteria as there are NANOG subscribers.
But Joe Abley's are the correct ones.
<ducking>
-Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130827/11c51ca2/attachment.bin>