[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers
- Subject: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers
- From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:54:42 -0400
- In-reply-to: <01bc01cea36a$0f55dfb0$2e019f10$@com>
- References: <017601cea358$00a86ad0$01f94070$@com> <[email protected]> <01bc01cea36a$0f55dfb0$2e019f10$@com>
On Aug 27, 2013, at 5:11 PM, "Eric Louie" <elouie at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tier 1 = Internet backbone providers (United States - AT&T, UUNET, Sprint,
> AboveNet/Zayo, Cogent, Qwest/CenturyLink, L3/GBLX). However, I might be
> better served with a Tier 2 for reachability as pointed out in another
You may want to revise your list, and look at the 3rd parties that measure and rank this data.
http://as-rank.caida.org/
http://www.renesys.com/2013/01/a-bakers-dozen-2012-edition/
You are missing a few networks that are important. Much of what someone considers a "major network" IMHO depends on how you scope them. Maybe you don't care about things not on your continent. Maybe you don't mind having a different ASN in Asia/Europe. Maybe you don't need to connect in Australia with the same routing policy.
The real answer is "it depends", and your criteria may not be the same as someone else.
- Jared