[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[SHAME] Spam Rats

Subject: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: froztbyte at froztbyte.net (JP Viljoen)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:43:26 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1357791333.2912.26.camel@karl> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 10 Jan 2013, at 6:41 AM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> No. A /64 has 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses.  Even if you
> had machines that supported zettabytes of data the zone would never
> load in human lifetimes.

Because hitting things in memory is the only way we can ever respond to a data request.

This wording is about as excellent as those who've been quoted on record to say people wouldn't want TVs ("boxes of wood") in their living rooms, etc.

-J

References:
- [SHAME] Spam Rats
  - From: julian at jdcomputers.com.au (Julian DeMarchi)
- [SHAME] Spam Rats
  - From: otis at ocosa.com (Otis L. Surratt, Jr.)
- [SHAME] Spam Rats
  - From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)
- [SHAME] Spam Rats
  - From: blakjak at blakjak.net (Mark Foster)
- [SHAME] Spam Rats
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

Prev by Date: [SHAME] Spam Rats
Next by Date: OOB core router connectivity wish list
Previous by thread: [SHAME] Spam Rats
Next by thread: [SHAME] Spam Rats
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread