[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CGN fixed/hashed nat question

Subject: CGN fixed/hashed nat question
From: ck-lists at cksoft.de (Christian Kratzer)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:21:55 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <CAP-guGW6zLvzGLyt4F5UjfrNOrNHGBaTMV04UgAmW0++Et10mQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHd7N8MV+Lwp_t41wx_f4UzZdx4zPfgn35Hy+BZkrEZ-72E4Ew@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGW6zLvzGLyt4F5UjfrNOrNHGBaTMV04UgAmW0++Et10mQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, William Herrin wrote:
<snipp/>
> The algorithm will exclude the .0 and .255 external addresses from
> use, mapping the respective internal IPs to the other externals.
<snipp/>

why would you want to do that. .0 and .255 are perfectly valid ips.

Greetings
Christian

-- 
Christian Kratzer                      CK Software GmbH
Email:   ck at cksoft.de                  Wildberger Weg 24/2
Phone:   +49 7032 893 997 - 0          D-71126 Gaeufelden
Fax:     +49 7032 893 997 - 9          HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart
Web:     http://www.cksoft.de/         Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer

Follow-Ups:
- CGN fixed/hashed nat question
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)

References:
- CGN fixed/hashed nat question
  - From: eric.oosting at gmail.com (Eric Oosting)
- CGN fixed/hashed nat question
  - From: dwing at cisco.com (Dan Wing)
- CGN fixed/hashed nat question
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- CGN fixed/hashed nat question
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- CGN fixed/hashed nat question
  - From: jfmezei_nanog at vaxination.ca (Jean-Francois Mezei)
- CGN fixed/hashed nat question
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)

Prev by Date: CGN fixed/hashed nat question
Next by Date: CGN fixed/hashed nat question
Previous by thread: CGN fixed/hashed nat question
Next by thread: CGN fixed/hashed nat question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread