[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Muni network ownership and the Fourth
- Subject: Muni network ownership and the Fourth
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:06:03 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAMYZk=fnTPE_7W-rNNUMzn3-ikhgPHJWVSeekubp_aSuH==gXg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAMYZk=fnTPE_7W-rNNUMzn3-ikhgPHJWVSeekubp_aSuH==gXg@mail.gmail.com>
In a message written on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:03:51PM -0500, Zachary Giles wrote:
> Not to sidestep the conversation here .. but, Leo, I love your concept
> of the muni network, MMR, etc. What city currently implements this? I
> want to move there! :)
I don't know any in the US that have the model I describe. :(
My limited understanding is some other countries have a similar model,
but I don't know of any good english language summaries. For instance I
believe the model used in Sweeden is substantially similar to what I
describe...
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130129/7581ef4f/attachment.bin>