[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Prism continued
- Subject: Prism continued
- From: carey at ar-ballbat.org (Andrew Carey)
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:01:39 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAJXc8RKN7awhiYZ9Th6sa=+yrGcXvoayzBsrsYsjLZN3HJRGtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPz7E52=1LE=JVo7W7Rwj4akq=qU5npnwfK6a--EVz_Lb0JxcA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Jun 13, 2013, at 3:52, Rich Kulawiec <rsk at gsp.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:30:53PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>> Ask the ex-CEO of Qwest what happens if you try to turn down an
>> offer the NSA makes you. :)
>
> Ah, yes. This:
>
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/2013-June/008815.html
And Bernie Ebbers was framed, too?
The linked email above erroneously describes Nacchio's defense as DOJ's theory, which is even more ridiculous (defense to insider trading charge is trading on insider information-- ok...).
As nice as it would have to have a martyr, Nacchio isn't it.