[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

peeringdb accuracy research

Subject: peeringdb accuracy research
From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:25:15 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 13/06/2013 17:48, Job Snijders wrote:
> Good news everyone, 99% of the parsable data in PeeringDB is valid! :-)

you mean: 99% of the parsable data in PeeringDB which is maintained by
people conscientious enough to provide the output of "show bgp sum" from
their routers, is valid.

Good talk, and interesting research, but I have a feeling that there might
be some unintentional researcher bias creeping in there. :-)

Nick

References:
- peeringdb accuracy research
  - From: job.snijders at atrato.com (Job Snijders)

Prev by Date: huawei
Next by Date: huawei
Previous by thread: peeringdb accuracy research
Next by thread: Cisco optics in Northern Virginia
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread