[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
huawei
On 6/14/13, Scott Helms <khelms at zcorum.com> wrote:
> Is it possible? Yes, but it's not feasible because the data rate would be
> too low. That's what I'm trying to get across. There are lots things that
> can be done but many of those are not useful.
[snip]
I agree that the data rate will be low. I don't agree that it's not feasible.
There will be indeed be _plenty_ of ways that a low bit rate channel
can do everything the right adversary needs.
A few bits for second is plenty of data rate for sending control
commands/rule changes to a router backdoor mechanism, stealing
passwords, or leaking cryptographic keys required to decrypt the VPN
data stream intercepted from elsewhere on the network, leaking
counters, snmp communities, or interface descriptions, or
criteria-selected forwarded data samples, etc....
--
-JH
- Follow-Ups:
- huawei
- From: khelms at zcorum.com (Scott Helms)
- huawei
- From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- References:
- huawei
- From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- huawei
- From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)
- huawei
- From: symack at gmail.com (Nick Khamis)
- huawei
- From: khelms at zcorum.com (Scott Helms)
- huawei
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- huawei
- From: khelms at zcorum.com (Scott Helms)
- huawei
- From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)
- huawei
- From: khelms at zcorum.com (Scott Helms)
- huawei
- From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- huawei
- From: khelms at zcorum.com (Scott Helms)
- huawei
- From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- huawei
- From: khelms at zcorum.com (Scott Helms)
- huawei
- From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- huawei
- From: khelms at zcorum.com (Scott Helms)