/25's prefixes announced into global routing table?

[lists.nanog at monmotha.net (Brandon Martin)]

On 06/22/2013 12:44 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> 	The forwarding hardware is generally going to be the limit, and
>>> that's going to be painful enough as we approach a half million
>>> prefixes.
>>
>> True. And that's why we must avoid IPv6.
>
> This is not only wrong, it makes no sense whatsoever.
>


So here's a question: has anyone done any musings/reasearch on how big 
of a global IPv6 table we could expect given current policies if IPv6 
were as widely deployed and used as IPv4 (or if IPv4 didn't exist)?
-- 
Brandon Martin