[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Help with Confederation-RR-MPBGP
- Subject: Help with Confederation-RR-MPBGP
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:39:53 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:25:20 -0700." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:25:20 -0700, Philip Lavine said:
> need some guidance on best practices
What the vendor says is best practices, or what people in the trenches say?
> Is it more efficient to use RR or Confederation?
If option A is 2% more "efficient" than option B, but takes 10% longer to
deploy and causes 3% more SLA payouts to your customers when the added
complexity causes a whoopsie, how much more work could you have gotten done in
the time you spent in an uncomfortable meeting explaining to upper management
why the whoopsie happened?
(Sorry, it's been that sort of week :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140612/bbb6fb60/attachment.pgp>