[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- Subject: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- From: cgrundemann at gmail.com (Chris Grundemann)
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 11:23:56 -0600
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAC1-dtkp2rjm=7tARPJNCXjky11u0S_R7xtumSzJ-M4tiNz=vg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:26 AM, MÃ¥ns Nilsson <mansaxel at besserwisser.org> wrote:
> The fact that you need v4 space to build a MPLS backbone is a very good
> reason to not waste a /10 on CGN crap.
Ah, so you're in the camp that a /10 given to one organization for
their private use would have been better than reserving that /10 for
_everyone_ to use. We'll have to agree to disagree there.
>
> Ideally, we would have a solution where an entire MPLS infrastructure
> could be built without v4 space, demoting v4 to a legacy application
> inside a VRF, but the MPLS standards wg seems content with status quo.
We can agree on that.
Thanks,
~Chris
>
> --
> MÃ¥ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
> MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
> I wish I was a sex-starved manicurist found dead in the Bronx!!
--
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com