[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.

Subject: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
From: adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk (Vitkovský Adam)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 07:48:55 +0000
In-reply-to: <CF8FBACE.8FFC%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CF8FBACE.8FFC%[email protected]>

> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Irwin, Kevin
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:39 PM
> IÂ¹m really surprised that most people have not hit this limit already, especially
> on the 9KÂ¹s, as it seems Cisco has some fuzzy math when it comes to the
> 512K limit.

I would actually be very surprised if someone would hit the 512K limit on ASRs. 
With 6500/7600 I can understand they've been around for ages and no one anticipated the 512k limit back then. 
But ASRs? When these where bough engineers must have known that 512k is not going to be enough. 
I guess one does some reading and tweaking before installing a box as a PE or Internet Edge. 

adam

Follow-Ups:
- Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)

References:
- Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
  - From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
  - From: Kevin.Irwin at cinbell.com (Irwin, Kevin)

Prev by Date: Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)?
Next by Date: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
Previous by thread: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
Next by thread: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread