[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
level3 dia egress filtering?
- Subject: level3 dia egress filtering?
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:21:38 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAJvB4tknM4wPEnE7iDBiHrsdgO5ab=sB-rYLi=H_LBvw1OZ3ZA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CALZUErZ3-b9MW5Nqo8jPEY8GALH9Wnjp1mYhN640wmw0_=wLrg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJvB4tknM4wPEnE7iDBiHrsdgO5ab=sB-rYLi=H_LBvw1OZ3ZA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 03:51:56 PM Blake Dunlap wrote:
> I would personally look at leaving Level 3 over that kind
> of response. I consider it basic service to throw a 1
> line acl on an interface temporarily in exceptional
> circumstances. Transit guys can argue if they wish, but
> it won't change my expectations as a customer.
> Eventually I'll find a carrier that will offer
> reasonable service.
I suppose the question then becomes your and the ISP's
interpretation of "exceptional circumstances".
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140513/cfa8d189/attachment.pgp>