[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)

Subject: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 12:04:18 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGTv30Ytp-kNq0ckqWc6Fc9tw-bptJO68YRp9A6TPJYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On 5/21/14, 9:38 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:

>On May 21, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Verizon Wireless is at 50% ipv6 penetration
>
>I suspect this would go up significantly if Twitter and Instagram would
>IPv6 enable their services.  Same for pintarest.

+1
We naturally focus a lot on network enablement here, but IMO it is a great
time to focus on more web-based services embracing IPv6 with another June
6 just around the corner. :-)

JL

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: Lee at asgard.org (Lee Howard)

References:
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: email at edylie.net (Pui Edylie)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: tony at wicks.co.nz (Tony Wicks)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Ca By)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)

Prev by Date: Large DDoS, small extortion
Next by Date: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Previous by thread: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Next by thread: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread