.sj/.bv == privacy?

[Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)]

On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:08:19 -0700, Dave Crocker said:

> In other words, anything that explicitly identifies traffic as
> attempting greater privacy is likely to be a greater target for attack.

Which is a good reason to encrypt all network traffic by default, even if
it's just videos of kittens.  You can still figure out a lot by doing
endpoint analysis, but it's a start (especially if one endpoint is
an 800 pound gorilla that can serve up almost anything).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20141001/c2d57586/attachment.pgp>