[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



Regards,

Tim Raphael

> On 11 Oct 2014, at 2:37 pm, Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 11, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal at snappytelecom.net> wrote:
>> 
>> I am trying to understand what is sub-optimal about doing so...Waste of Ipv6 space ? or some other technical reason ?
> 
> It's wasteful of address space, but more importantly, it turns your router into a sinkole.
> 
>> (is a /64 address are a 'sinkhole' the only reason ? )
> 
> That's a pretty big reason not to use /64s.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
> 
>                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.
> 
>                     -- Laocoön
>