[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
large BCP38 compliance testing
- Subject: large BCP38 compliance testing
- From: alvarezp at alvarezp.ods.org (Octavio Alvarez)
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:22:34 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAAAwwbWG6+NtR9MSgxK-RDpDB=UVyDoEVQDacNifob+wZavTxA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbWG6+NtR9MSgxK-RDpDB=UVyDoEVQDacNifob+wZavTxA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/10/14 18:44, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
>> The *real* problem isn't the testing.
>> It's the assumption that you can actually *do* anything useful with this data.
>> Name-n-shame probably won't get us far - and the way the US works, if there's a
>
> At least "name and shame" is something more useful than nothing done.
Has it worked for the deaggregation offenders named by the CIDR report?