[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
mpls over microwave
- Subject: mpls over microwave
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:20:37 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAB-EkT6oHapBe2-26Lu+6QMniwQasKmeNMiKBNyeCw1C=M0Kug@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAB-EkT6oHapBe2-26Lu+6QMniwQasKmeNMiKBNyeCw1C=M0Kug@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/Feb/15 00:31, Eric Louie wrote:
> I work for a fixed wireless provider, and our mpls-capable backhauls are
> all running mpls with 9200 MTU with no problem. The only weirdness I
> encounter is if I have multiple equal-cost routes to the same location, one
> over MPLS and one not, end up having ping/unreachable issues from my
> monitoring equipment. The solution has been to cost one path (the MPLS)
> lower than the other. The only other problem I had was with radio's that
> didn't support larger 9000+ byte MTU packets - we've phased that radio out
> for now. if you run MPLS with 1500 byte MTU, you'll have issues with 1500
> byte packets with the DF-bit set. That was a nasty discovery in the
> production network, your mileage will not vary with that problem.
I'm curious why you'd have multiple paths in your network (equal-cost to
boot) where some support and others don't.
Mark.