[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
- Subject: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
- From: thegameiam at yahoo.com (David Barak)
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:07:18 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAB-EkT75-oQ5ASqkmxNqKZBRcJ9q_RWaahd9-uUA1edK8eQ+ag@mail.gmail.com> <CAP-guGWx=tYTCPCMF5Lkh_gsqSTDyWXh9BNRGNDDy2zSNO7qEw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGXtXT5d4vNc-7H=9dP-FMmAgJhOOqWgcs2mwPjkArPOyA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWsJqJT7rttFEAa2szPAFNew6xm-hAmNYroxPLWE2GuTg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
> On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 30, 2015, at 18:07 , William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> How about this: when Verizon starts decommissioning its IPv4
>> infrastructure on the basis that IPv6 is widespread enough to no
>> longer require the expense of dual-stack, IPv6 will have achieved
>> ubiquity.
>
> Um, no. The judgment of one traditional telephone company is hardly where I would look to contemplate the future of the internet.
Then AT&T, Comcast, Cox, Level3, etc, could be reasonable examples?
I think the general point is worth considering - when v4 gear is regularly being pulled out of commission by large carriers because "who needs it?" and replaced with v6 only gear, we will have achieved true ubiquity. I think you'll see v4 for quite a while. Heck, I still run across SNA, Token Ring, and other really old stuff occasionally...
David Barak
Sent from a mobile device, please forgive autocorrection.