[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

v6 deagg

Subject: Re: v6 deagg Date: Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 01:48:48PM +0100 Quoting Sander Steffann (sander at steffann.nl):

> > However, apparently there is no such process or intention available
> > from the RIR in question (RIPE), short of explicitly asking for that
> > specific prefix.
> 
> So you asked to grow the /48 to a /47? Was it accepted? Or did you want the RIR to automatically grow your first assignment when you request a second one without you having to ask?

So far have just discussed it with my LIR, but will reinit this. 
 
> > Of course this does not help every case, but supporting aggregation
> > where possible certainly ought to be in-scope for most policy-making
> > bodies in this area.
> 
> Then please take this to the appropriate policy-making body: address-policy-wg at ripe.net :-)

Considering this as well. 

-- 
MÃ¥ns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
... this must be what it's like to be a COLLEGE GRADUATE!!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150222/6aaeec98/attachment.pgp>