[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
- Subject: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
- From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:07:03 -0600 (CST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
More symmetry will happen when the home user does more things that care about symmetry. It's a simple allocation of spectrum (whether wireless, DSL or cable). MHz for upload are taken out of MHz for download.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce H McIntosh" <bhm at ufl.edu>
To: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:03:35 AM
Subject: Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
On 2015-02-27 11:45, Mike Hammett wrote:
> What about ISPs that aren't world-class dicks?
>
The REAL evil in the ISP marketplace is, of course, essentially entirely
unremarked-upon - ASYMMETRY. For the Internet, as such, truly to live
up to its promise to continue to revolutionize the world through free
exchange of ideas, information, data and so forth, Joe Average User
*MUST* have the same pipes going UP as he does coming DOWN. Just as an
example, my service at home is what, 50 down/5 up? That structure is
less conducive to free interchange and more conducive to the
Big-Brotherâ?¢-seal-of-approval mindless consumption of whatever content
THEYâ?¢ deem necessary and sufficient to keep the bread and circus masses
dull and uninvolved. Plus, the slow uplink speeds make remote backups
dreadfully impractical for the home user. So let's see some symmetry in
the offerings, ISPs, ok?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce H. McIntosh bhm at ufl.edu
Senior Network Engineer http://net-services.ufl.edu
University of Florida Network Services 352-273-1066