[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

What is lawful content? [was VZ...]

Subject: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
From: weaselkeeper at gmail.com (Jim Richardson)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:12:42 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <D1164EF6.F9D65%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
> I am not a lawyer (in fact, I Am Not An Isp), but my understanding is this is pretty well settled.
>
> And it is not even weird or esoteric. If the content on the site is against the law in the jurisdiction in question, it is not legal (duh). Otherwise, yes it is, and no ISP gets to decide whether you can see it or not.

Which is the "jurisdiction in question" ? the originating website? the
ISP? the CDN network's corporate home? my home?

Follow-Ups:
- What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
  - From: deleskie at gmail.com (deleskie at gmail.com)
- What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)

References:
- What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)

Prev by Date: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
Next by Date: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]
Previous by thread: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
Next by thread: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread