[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Routing Insecurity (Re: BGP in the Washington Post)
- Subject: Routing Insecurity (Re: BGP in the Washington Post)
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 17:21:00 +0200
- In-reply-to: <17689457.2434.1433171075960.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
- References: <17689457.2434.1433171075960.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
On 1/Jun/15 17:04, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Actually, that's the level of attention given to all kinds of infrastructure just about everywhere. ;-)
The difference is that there are standardized (global) guidelines for
those infrastructures within their own industry, that lack of compliance
can lead to serious fines, jail time or both.
A network operator unmaliciously screwing up their BGP configuration and
taking one side of a continent out is unlikely to see any punishment
beyond being fired by his employer, or losing his customers if
self-employed.
Mark.