[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AWS Elastic IP architecture
- Subject: AWS Elastic IP architecture
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 10:51:14 +1000
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:08:42 -0400." <CAL9jLaYXCdfViHbUPx-=rs4vSx5mFECpfuE8b7VQ+Au2hCXpMQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAA5Ek4dprA7ET9FTFYdh0eOLG2y5khSqV6L2zAknSiPKCJaJJw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA5Ek4c-FRfqgysaenU0_JB9y-Y0_4ZGsX22g3NgcR18nTv89A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <D190F68B.52B0E%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaYKwBt8XqjU9ikci1iXYeK-CkUpFx3dSiZtX=d7zKnm0Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLabzwHRON-d=jhT+qKc=s-CcDzYSyzarW9auRfKZMm+Xzw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaYXCdfViHbUPx-=rs4vSx5mFECpfuE8b7VQ+Au2hCXpMQ@mail.gmail.com>
In message <CAL9jLaYXCdfViHbUPx-=rs4vSx5mFECpfuE8b7VQ+Au2hCXpMQ at mail.gmail.com>
, Christopher Morrow writes:
> So... I don't really see any of the above arguments for v6 in a vm
> setup to really hold water in the short term at least. I think for
> sure you'll want v6 for public services 'soon' (arguably like 10 yrs
> ago so you'd get practice and operational experience and ...) but for
> the rest sure it's 'nice', and 'cute', but really not required for
> operations (unless you have v6 only customers)
Everyone has effectively IPv6-only customers today. IPv6 native +
CGN only works for services. Similarly DS-Lite and 464XLAT.
Sometimes you can get away w/o IPv6, sometimes you can't. In all
cases IPv4 is getting more and more expensive to support as more
customers share public IP addresses even if it is just have to
re-tune rate limits to account for the sharing.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org