[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Anycast provider for SMTP?
- Subject: Anycast provider for SMTP?
- From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:57:59 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAP-guGU8fEZ4mHX4jaEFOaRqH_swtvbsSUArq4M9EgQEf-H7=w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAO0-hXZKU2gSt3vqj_p0B85xH=yt6RwXJfh_EY9HTzhygnj0Rg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGU8fEZ4mHX4jaEFOaRqH_swtvbsSUArq4M9EgQEf-H7=w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:54 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> Okay, granted you can probably cover your corner case here with a
> priority 20 MX that leads to a unicast address on one of the two
> servers. SMTP can let the rare fellow with the bisected packet flow
> gracefully fall back.
but 'well behaved smtp clients' should already be falling back right?