[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Anycast provider for SMTP?
- Subject: Anycast provider for SMTP?
- From: dave.taht at gmail.com (Dave Taht)
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:05:55 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAO0-hXZKU2gSt3vqj_p0B85xH=yt6RwXJfh_EY9HTzhygnj0Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CAP-guGXUuST7T9XiUNpLHq0g=4UpBXUt-QB0ddp9_rUccr620Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> On 15/06/2015 19:09, William Herrin wrote:
>> Anycast + TCP = much pain, for reasons which should be obvious.
>
> This was presented at some conference or other a couple of years ago:
>
>> https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog37/presentations/matt.levine.pdf
>From that otherwise encouraging preso:
"What about IPv6? We have a plan! We plan to be dead before customers
demand IPv6".
I am pretty sure the authors are still alive(?).
I have been using anycast at a small scale on mesh networks, for dns,
primarily. Works.
> Nick
>
>
--
Dave T?ht
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast