[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Anycast provider for SMTP?
- Subject: Anycast provider for SMTP?
- From: woody at pch.net (Bill Woodcock)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:43:26 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAP-guGU8fEZ4mHX4jaEFOaRqH_swtvbsSUArq4M9EgQEf-H7=w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAO0-hXZKU2gSt3vqj_p0B85xH=yt6RwXJfh_EY9HTzhygnj0Rg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGU8fEZ4mHX4jaEFOaRqH_swtvbsSUArq4M9EgQEf-H7=w@mail.gmail.com>
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 11:54 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> I think you've offered some really bad advice here Bill.
As I said, there are lots of people who _think_ it doesn?t work. And then there are people who?ve actually done it, and know better.
Besides, you seem to not have read what I actually posted. In which the advice I gave was _not_ to do anycast TCP, so as to avoid having to deal with people who _think_ they know something, and are excessively verbal about it. Which is tedious.
Perhaps better advice would have been to go ahead and do it, solving his problem, but to just not post to NANOG about it, so he doesn?t have to listen to people who think they know better telling him that what he?s doing isn?t possible. Bumblebees, flight, etc.
-Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150616/a52b1c33/attachment.pgp>