[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Anycast provider for SMTP?
- Subject: Anycast provider for SMTP?
- From: joe at nethead.com (Joe Hamelin)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:36:43 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAJB2g-EM=VgmZnb-KfY7R_b1Yjor2EOpjRHLE8jrE-c-jAXLww@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAO0-hXZKU2gSt3vqj_p0B85xH=yt6RwXJfh_EY9HTzhygnj0Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJB2g-EM=VgmZnb-KfY7R_b1Yjor2EOpjRHLE8jrE-c-jAXLww@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Rafael Possamai <rafael at gav.ufsc.br> wrote:
> Any luck on a DNS based solution?
>
I'm looking into a F5 GTM solution based out of a colo we have in Europe to
direct SMTP between France and the US hubs. Now I just have to work layers
8 & 9.
Remember when users didn't expect sub-minute delivery times?
Thanks for everyone's help, you've give me a lot of good ideas to consider
and I've learned more than I ever thought I would about anycast. Although
I'm not on the BGP end of things anymore I value the minds, personalities
and pure history that NANOG brings.
Total side note: I remember back at a NANOG in Atlanta, 2000 maybe, at a
BOF on ARIN allocations where I was arguing for netblocks less than a /21
because Amazon couldn't justify that much at that time, I mean we only had
one public site but still wanted to multi-home. I remember Randy Bush even
backed me up on that one. In the end I did get a block for Amazon and
brought up BGP. Oh how times have changed (and how I wish I still had
those stock options!)
Best regards,
Joe (ex JH484)
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>