[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4
- Subject: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4
- From: tom at cloudflare.com (Tom Paseka)
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:54:47 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CALFTrnPoLfsOHRqPU5B3NMvWCD_5b-2YjBsd=NweQyzar+KLwQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CADR+d4b4AZXGy4BvcemXsGrdMFmJ598XX27NZpj8hz7X871ykg@mail.gmail.com> <CALFTrnPoLfsOHRqPU5B3NMvWCD_5b-2YjBsd=NweQyzar+KLwQ@mail.gmail.com>
You'll find as well, a lot of hosts (eg, I know at least Windows XP)
won't forward to Class E destinations.
-Tom
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Ray Soucy <rps at maine.edu> wrote:
> There is already more than enough address space allocated for NAT, you
> don't need to start using random prefixes that may or may not be needed for
> other purposes in the future.
>
> For all we know, tomorrow someone could write an RFC requesting an address
> reserved for local anycast DNS and it could be assigned from this block.
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Luan Nguyen <lnguyen at opsource.net> wrote:
>
>> Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it?
>> Just for NATTING on Cisco gears...
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ray Patrick Soucy
> Network Engineer
> University of Maine System
>
> T: 207-561-3526
> F: 207-561-3531
>
> MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network
> www.maineren.net