[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4
Not used in the sense you imagine, but I designed a hack where we hash IPv6
addresses into 224/3 (class D and E space) so backends that don't support
IPv6 can still be provided a pseudo-IP. This accelerated support of IPv6
across all Google services without needing to wait for each individual
backend to provide support.
See
https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog50/presentations/Wednesday/NANOG50.Talk41.colitti-IPv6%20transition%20experiences.pdf
slide 4 for a description, or
http://docs.guava-libraries.googlecode.com/git/javadoc/com/google/common/net/InetAddresses.html
for open-sourced code.
There may be other uses for IPs beyond routing.
Damian
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Luan Nguyen <lnguyen at opsource.net> wrote:
> Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it?
> Just for NATTING on Cisco gears...
>