[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
- Subject: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:08:35 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAObxEFBR5XGYhomFBYv2Kp-TNNyOsL+nEOwRQB4h7FFkQyRUpg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAFN0R26s22kpK_97WtKBbG-iNUkzpn2pZ24kWMsJih=+-WSKQg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGTfYMLu_AqEQaYNuREPLxAhtDiH5L8PGzrD1L_r8p=HxA@mail.gmail.com> <CADn4PSgE_LycEwMyK6dKLCWKQeB7c18CAQjD6A7qunh4Exf9DA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=Z9ZfzfdKofSOnPDM_FpuS22OruwGxsVqak2EQeQhAoFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFJiuFpzO91_coAp=2VUQKaiKehXCPZAJsvWeG_5yTE0j-UuWw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BckbR=ab7pWvE8h4zYUe3hc_iLPKFu_vNbqmFVJ=ppjQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CADn4PSgjyQJyU6aUmbPbJMQGQx9PGTSG_Vx9=rFkN__wJq7U7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAObxEFBR5XGYhomFBYv2Kp-TNNyOsL+nEOwRQB4h7FFkQyRUpg@mail.gmail.com>
I have to agree with Rick here.
Owen
> On Jun 29, 2016, at 22:43 , Rick Astley <jnanog at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Dan in that even if you disagreed with the talk you
> have to agree that it probably spawned relevant discussion and reflection
> (both on and off list). I would hate to see a move to ideas and discussions
> that are chosen simply for offending the fewest people. Another sort of
> similar critique aimed at large routing vendors was "Help! My big expensive
> router is really expensive" at NANOG 60 in Atlanta. Perhaps the critiques
> were seen as more constructive and I don't remember the same backlash after
> the talk but I found both talks and various discussions that followed
> insightful.
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Daniel Golding <dgolding at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm - as far as whether this was a good or bad NANOG presentation...this is
>> some of the best discussion I've seen on list in a while. There is a frank
>> exchange of views between many different parties. This may result in some
>> follow-up presentations at future NANOGs by IXP operators (please!).
>>
>> Seems that, whether you agree with Dave or not, it was successful. It also
>> seems that the IXP operators who came under the most criticism have reacted
>> with a lot of professionalism and maturity. Other IXP operators have
>> reacted pretty poorly, which is ironic.
>>
>> Dan
>>