[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69?
- Subject: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69?
- From: bob at FiberInternetCenter.com (Bob Evans)
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:58:53 -0800
- In-reply-to: <4094203a-c8ba-4afa-b16c-2506b7dd0f10@Spark>
- References: <CAEmG1=r_EcVYCm_9LW+AFrMCWjR5w6BSXfqQ=zfsjR3Bd-4gfQ@mail.gmail.com> <4094203a-c8ba-4afa-b16c-2506b7dd0f10@Spark>
I suggest in the future NOT to get rid of something because a new method
is attempted. I.E nanog had a nice method of identifying potential and
existing peers with a simple green dot at registration to indicate an
individual was involved with BGP in their company. That went away and
today there is nothing. Cost of implementation was less than 5 dollars at
any office supply retailer.
Just a thought.
Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO
> The Peering Personals has been shelved while we try to figure out a better
> option.
>
> There was no peering content submitted to the Program Committee that
> justified a separate track, and so they chose to include the content in
> the general session throughout the program.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Dave
>
> On Feb 6, 2017, 8:12 AM -0500, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com>,
> wrote:
>> I'm squinting at the Guidebook for NANOG69,
>> and I don't seem to see any peering BOF or
>> peering social this time around. Am I being
>> blind again, and it's on the agenda somewhere
>> but I'm just overlooking it?
>> Pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks! :)
>>
>> Matt
>