[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
backbones filtering unsanctioned sites
- Subject: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites
- From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:49:29 -0600 (CST)
- In-reply-to: <CAFYhaDZwWGtBsFkKONY2eOuVq_fL=MQOkas0xEQXJsPfWBB9MA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1913971261.3711.1486751984247.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <CAFYhaDZwWGtBsFkKONY2eOuVq_fL=MQOkas0xEQXJsPfWBB9MA@mail.gmail.com>
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Rokeach" <jason at rokeach.net>
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog at ics-il.net>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 12:46:57 PM
Subject: Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites
This looks pretty intentional to me. From http://www.cogentco.com/en/network/looking-glass :
BGP routing table entry for 104.31.18.30/32 , version 611495773
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Local
10.255.255.255 (metric 10177050) from 154.54.66.21 (154.54.66.21)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 150, valid, internal, best
Community: 174:990 174:20912 174:21001
Originator: 66.28.1.228, Cluster list: 154.54.66.21, 66.28.1.9 BGP routing table entry for 104.31.19.30/32 , version 611495772
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Local
10.255.255.255 (metric 10177050) from 154.54.66.21 (154.54.66.21)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 150, valid, internal, best
Community: 174:990 174:20912 174:21001
Originator: 66.28.1.228, Cluster list: 154.54.66.21, 66.28.1.9
Call it a "hunch" but I doubt 10.255.255.255 is a valid next-hop router.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Mike Hammett < nanog at ics-il.net > wrote:
Have we determined that this is intentional vs. some screw up?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brielle Bruns" < bruns at 2mbit.com >
To: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 12:28:53 PM
Subject: Re: backbones filtering unsanctioned sites
On 2/9/17 9:18 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> https://torrentfreak.com/internet-backbone-provider-cogent-blocks-pirate-bay-and-other-pirate-sites-170209/
>
> /kc
>
Funny. Someone else got back:
"Abuse cannot not provide you a list of websites that may be
encountering reduced visibility via Cogent"
I almost wish I had a Cogent circuit just to bring this up with an
account rep. Almost.
I'd very much so view this as a contractual violation on Cogent's part.
Cogent keeps contacting me every year wanting to sell me service. This
will be a good one to bring up when they call me next time.
--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org