[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment
> Can I summarize the current round of objections to my admittedly
> off-beat proposal (use basically URLs rather than IP addresses in IP
> packet src/dest) as:
>
> We can't do that! It would require changing something!
Nope. You can summarize it as "it doesn't scale", which is what has
killed endless numbers of superficially plausible bad ideas.
Like I said, if there were a few thousand URLs it could work, but with
hundreds of millions or billions, not a chance. Numbers with five zeros
and numbers with nine zeros are not the same.
But while we're proposing bad ideas, how about this one: we pull the
domain name out of the URL and flip it around and put it at the front, so
instead of https://badidea.com/crud we have "com.badidea/https://crud."
Now we can do hierarchical routing, starting with the "com" and then
"com.badidea", shoving the DNS resolution into the router.
There's only a few thousand top level domains, so routers should he able
to handle this with no problem. Whaddaya think?
Regards,
John Levine, johnl at taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly