[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
VDSL
On 10/16/19 2:42 PM, Jeff Shultz wrote:
> But I'm confused a bit by the below - G.Fast is a twisted pair
> standard, last I saw - why would a cable (presumably coax) company be
> offering it? Are they just taking over the PTT's inside wiring?
G.fast has definitions for both twisted pair and coax PHYs. That gets
everybody interested.
The biggest issue for the CATV operators is that the coax PHY
monopolizes the cable meaning you can't use it for conventional
channelized RF type services, so if the subscriber wants cable TV in
addition to IP service, you either have to have a side-by-side IPTV
deployment or revert to running DOCSIS over channelized RF next to your
linear TV system. I've seen micro fiber-fed DOCSIS nodes for this
purpose. DOCSIS 3.1 with a good RF budget and lots of channel space can
get a few gigs of bandwidth which is quite usable for a midsize MDU.
Chuck one of those down in the telco room, and you're good to feed
potentially a couple hundred units using traditional DOCSIS+linear TV
which is what people expect from a CATV operator. Anyone who just wants
IP service and ends up wanting tons of bandwidth can get moved over to
packet-fed G.fast as needed.
--
Brandon Martin
- Follow-Ups:
- VDSL
- From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)
- References:
- VDSL
- From: rod.beck at unitedcablecompany.com (Rod Beck)
- VDSL
- From: matt at netfire.net (Matt Harris)
- VDSL
- From: bruns at 2mbit.com (Brielle)
- VDSL
- From: lists.nanog at monmotha.net (Brandon Martin)
- VDSL
- From: rod.beck at unitedcablecompany.com (Rod Beck)
- VDSL
- From: jeffshultz at sctcweb.com (Jeff Shultz)