[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
fuzzy subnet aggregation
- Subject: fuzzy subnet aggregation
- From: tony at lavanauts.org (Antonio Querubin)
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 16:30:53 -1000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Are you trying to reduce the number of ACL rules that include a known set of addresses but also minimize covered addresses that are not part of the mandatory set?
Tony
> On Oct 27, 2019, at 12:29, Joe Maimon <jmaimon at jmaimon.com> wrote:
>
> 
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 3:09 PM Joe Maimon <jmaimon at jmaimon.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> your aim is to get to maximum aggregation .. with some overage, like
>> 90% of a /24 ?
>> so missing like 25 addresses in a whole /24.. (for instance)
>
> I would be happy to get /29's missing 3 /28's missing 5, etc...
>
> This is not punitive, its about scale.
>
> Joe
>