D'oH III: In 3-D! Plot Twist from Google/Chrome, Vixie approves?

[royce at techsolvency.com (Royce Williams)]

The difference is that Chrome won't use resolvers other than the ones
you've configured yourself, and will simply opportunistically upgrade to
DoH if they detect that those resolvers support it.

In other words, there is no usurpation of administrative intent.

Royce

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:30 AM Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:

> It's not clear to me whether Paul is expressing approval of the whole
> shebang
> at this point, or just the one change they've made, but, just on first
> look,
> I don't think that change addresses *my* distaste for DoH, as discussed in
> last month's 100-poster.  :-)
>
>
> https://www.zdnet.com/article/dns-over-https-google-hits-back-at-misinformation-and-confusion-over-its-plans/
>
> TL;DR: they (Chrome) won't enable DoH unless it's being run from an
> internet
> which they know supports it; there are apparently a list of 8-12 ISPs/etc
> which are announcing such support.
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
> jra at baylink.com
> Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC
> 2100
> Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land
> Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647
> 1274
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191030/fb00d724/attachment.html>