[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Best components for a full mvno core network?
- Subject: Best components for a full mvno core network?
- From: dario.renaud at gmail.com (Dario Renaud)
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:56:41 +0100
- In-reply-to: <FTWFN0N7Or89fFTvIrsoD5IroKaqj5PDwyM7ESrUi5Uk5CEjpD7iOpCFg2nA2ATLEEVZulqGjrCWNUZA3bLxLozxUJPNYvz9674TcmTwLWg=@paolucci.ca>
- References: <CABFfL_eNfRz5M9c7H8mr6WAZP2M0_KgX1QdDec=BiCUcJVjspw@mail.gmail.com> <FTWFN0N7Or89fFTvIrsoD5IroKaqj5PDwyM7ESrUi5Uk5CEjpD7iOpCFg2nA2ATLEEVZulqGjrCWNUZA3bLxLozxUJPNYvz9674TcmTwLWg=@paolucci.ca>
Thanks Andrew
Clearwater does some interesting things. Compared to other projects, they
seem to have given a lot of thought to scalability.
But I am a bit surprised of their focus on I- S-CSCF & BGCF.
I guess they are assuming either MNO customers already equipped with SBC
able to do the P-CSCF. Or MVNO build around a local breakout model.
Le jeu. 31 oct. 2019 à 06:15, <andrew at paolucci.ca> a écrit :
> From my experience Project Clearwater is the most matured IMS Core
> solution.
> http://www.projectclearwater.org/
>
> Also has a commercial offering.
> https://www.metaswitch.com/products/core-network/clearwater-ims-core
>
> Good Luck!
> Regards,
> Andrew Paolucci
>
>
>
> â??â??â??â??â??â??â?? Original Message â??â??â??â??â??â??â??
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 10:19 AM, Dario Renaud <
> dario.renaud at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> At my day job, we are considering going Full MVNO. Which means building a
> mobile core network.
>
> I was wondering if some of you would have feedback or advices on the
> solutions currently available?
>
> We would like to avoid the big providers (Ericsson & such).
> Ideally, something opensource, or, if proprietary, a company maybe willing
> to license access to the code (one can dream).
>
> There seems to be a lot of bits and pieces available out there, with a mix
> of full, fullish or partial solutions. This makes for quite the puzzle.
>
> Among the ones I found most interesting:
>
> nextEPC, covering, well, the EPCâ?¦ (https://github.com/nextepc/nextepc).
> It looks like the more active open EPC implementation out there.
>
> And it seems that Yate people have a commercial product covering basically
> everything needed (
> https://yatebts.com/solutions_and_technology/mobile_virtual_network_operator/
> ).
>
> What do you think?
>
> Regards
>
> Dario Renaud
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191031/cbb59caa/attachment.html>