[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs
- Subject: The Cost of Paid Peering with Chinese ISPs
- From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis Klētnieks)
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 23:46:19 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAEnbXKuyk5Qah7vdPS35dSp3sRfbjTm=i_K3t3Hz_Ay52mu5jQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:47:22 -0700, Matt Corallo said:
> No one suggested it isn���t censorship, you���re bating here. Not deploying
> enough international capacity is absolutely a form or censorship deployed to
> great avail - if international sites load too slow, you can skimp on GF
> appliances!
So.. who was being "censored" when a recent game release caused capacity
problems and slow throughput for others?
Censorship, *by definition*, is content-dependent. Capacity issues are either
byte-count or packet-count dependent, and don't distinguish between pictures of
huge rubber duckies in Tiananmen square, and pictures of Mount Kilimanjaro.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200401/9c047bcd/attachment.sig>