[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CGNAT Solutions

Subject: CGNAT Solutions
From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:44:14 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAO4Pa9oOWLbvMOsnLeMhH3yWBR_f_11S0tQNDbSV1wO3ebFCdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAP-guGWsu_KA5Ygdn8WSHnt6Ca8BzW7qrVaaCE2o2Ri9Sez9oA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Robert Blayzor wrote:

> So as a happy medium of about 2048 ports per subscriber, that's roughly 
> a 32:1 NAT/IP over-subscription ?

Yes, around that.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

References:
- CGNAT Solutions
  - From: john at alcock.org (John Alcock)
- CGNAT Solutions
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- CGNAT Solutions
  - From: lists.nanog at monmotha.net (Brandon Martin)
- CGNAT Solutions
  - From: rblayzor.bulk at inoc.net (Robert Blayzor)
- CGNAT Solutions
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- CGNAT Solutions
  - From: rblayzor.bulk at inoc.net (Robert Blayzor)

Prev by Date: Abuse Desks
Next by Date: CGNAT Solutions
Previous by thread: CGNAT Solutions
Next by thread: CGNAT Solutions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread