[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dual Homed BGP
- Subject: Dual Homed BGP
- From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 16:51:12 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAASS9CTBrMQpw11QP1HaFK1_f+xcp3j4epWd6Ex=fmBdADFWrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7BLqGbXbPuzJjpbnN5pVPfTLcQjsQT8z11qu8pgsvKGvQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BHMKazJ4ZNoYBgGYfAzbn9av4dSH5=aoQ9xfKJyX_Ygw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 14:02, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> But that only accounts for about 15% of our overall traffic. The rest
> comes from peering.
I'd really like to hear more datapoints from different eyeballs on this, like
60% local caches, of remaining traffic, 70% peered
so transit = 0.4*0.3 = 12%
I think this might be reasonable, but perhaps it's even less transit
for eyeballs today?
--
++ytti