[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
alternative to voip gateways
- Subject: alternative to voip gateways
- From: mel at beckman.org (Mel Beckman)
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:03:57 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
> Brandon Martin said:
> In most of the USA, it's simply not cost-feasible to get access to that unless you either are the ILEC or are a well-established CLEC from a long time ago.
Brandon,
In the OPâ??s case however, the copper plant is private, and wholly owned and already in operation. So surely in that situation fiber would be much more expensive to dig and trench.
-mel via cell
> On May 7, 2020, at 8:58 AM, Brandon Martin <lists.nanog at monmotha.net> wrote:
>
> On 5/7/20 5:13 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>> Investment for FTTH is 10 times or more than that for plain DSL.
>
> Only if you're comparing entirely new copper plant to existing copper plant (including drops), in my experience. If you compare greenfield to greenfield, the cost of fiber to the prem is not much greater than copper (coax or twisted pair).
>
> If you've already got access to existing copper plant, then reusing at least the drops is definitely worth looking into, yes.
>
> In most of the USA, it's simply not cost-feasible to get access to that unless you either are the ILEC or are a well-established CLEC from a long time ago. The ILEC mostly gets free reign to set the access costs, and they set them sufficiently high as to "discourage" competition from using it where they can get away with it.
> --
> Brandon Martin