RIPE NCC Executive Board election

[elad at netstyle.io (Elad Cohen)]

LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be deployed.
________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM
To: nanog at nanog.org <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election


I suspect heâ??d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4 because any extension of IPv4 use makes the netblocksâ??s heâ??s obtained questionable â??ownershipâ?? of more valuable, in theory.



From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus.com at nanog.org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM
To: "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election



Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:



https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traffic.html



Some internet service providers may have more than half of their traffic as IPv6.



Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:



https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html



Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to abandon the work already done?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200513/eba64109/attachment.html>