[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-donnelly-capport-detection

I support adoption. I'd like to see it move to some conclusion.

-----Original Message-----
From: Captive-portals [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Erik Kline
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-donnelly-capport-detection

All,

As indicated in the minutes from Prague
[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a general hum in favor of the API document:

    """
    4. API document: do we need a milestone? Humming: in favor.
    5. Is this document a good basis. Humming in favor.
    """"

This email is to initiate a two week call for adoption for:

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-donnelly-capport-detection/

Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague.

Thanks,
-Erik