[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-larose-capport-architecture
Likewise, as one of the authors, I support adoption.
-----Original Message-----
From: Captive-portals [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Dolson
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:21 PM
To: Erik Kline; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-larose-capport-architecture
As one of the authors, I support adoption.
David Dolson
Sandvine
Original Message
From: Erik Kline
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-larose-capport-architecture
All,
As indicated in the minutes from Prague
[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a general hum in favor of the architecture document:
"""
1. for arch doc, do we want a milestone for architecture. Humming: in favor.
2. is the document a good basis for the milestone? Humming: in favor.
"""
This email is to initiate a two week adoption call for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-larose-capport-architecture/
Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague.
Thanks,
-Erik
_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals